An estimate made in 2009 calculated that there are 4.3 million Muslims in Germany (5.4% of the population). Of these, 1.9 million are German citizens (2.4%). As of 2006, about 15,000 Muslims are converts of ethnic German ancestry.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
@ISIDEWITH7yrs
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
Immigrants should be allowed based on their beliving into western country ideals.
No, but we should limit immigration from “high risk” countries.
No, but we should limit immigration from'' high risk'' countries.
Ban it forever and kill the ones already here.
@986YYN92mos
No, but we should limit immigration from ''high risk'' countries as much as possible.
No, but government should demand serious effort from immigrant's end to integrate into the gean society
No, but there should be heavier screening on immigrants from "high risk" countries
@977G79C3mos
No, but we should limit immigration for some countries with radical ideologies.
@976WJ3T3mos
No, but we should limit immigration from some countries.
No, but we should limit immigration from ''high risk countries''.
@96WMBWX3mos
No, but we should limit immigration from high risk countries.
@92JXK3J7mos
Yes. We must ensure that our screening process can improve to ensure that terrorism cannot enter the country before reaccepting Muslim immigrants.
@93MK5NX7mos
make sure they are not a thereat to national security
@92YHQCV8mos
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but we should do background checks on immigrants from “high risk” countries, just in case
Deleted9mos
Yes, there should be a limit while we help out our poor citizens first.
Deleted9mos
Yes, we need to be helping our poor citizens before letting in more immigrants.
Deleted9mos
Yes, there should be a limit. We need to be helping our poor first.
Deleted9mos
Yes, there should be a limit. We need to be helping the poor first.
@92ZYZRW9mos
Yes we should ban it until we have more ability to guarantee who they are and if they have no proof of identity they should not be allowed in the country.
@9334YP39mos
All non-Christian, homosexual and transgender immigrants should be banned from entering the country indefinitely.
@92YHQCV9mos
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. However, immigrants from “high risk” countries should be allowed entry too, but only after extensive background checks and continuous monitoring to ensure they have no terrorist connections.
@92GWJXX10mos
No, but we should be helping our homeless first.
@7MKJ4WC10mos
Maybe, if the geopolitical climate is increasingly terroristic and unstable-e.g., Trump's reasoning for the temporary shutdown in December.
Deleted10mos
We should prioritize Christians.
@92B3M2K10mos
No, because Muslims are peaceful and people wrongfully accuse them to bring terrorists. Islam is a religion of peace.
@923Z93G10mos
Yes, as well as all other immigrants
@ThomasJ24911mos
Yes, there should be a limit.
@8ZTM4PG11mos
No, but if they are from high risk countries be sure to be more thorough in checking them.
@ThomasJ47611mos
Yes, only let in a small amount of families.
@8ZGYJSG11mos
yes because we would be weeding out terrorist and no because it would be considered a race crime.
@ThomasJJ9912mos
No, make safe zones in their countries so they don't destroy ours.
No, anyone that truly want to be free should be able to apply to become a citizen. But a thorough vetting on any immigrant needs to be implemented.
@Thomasjj681yr
Yes, make safe zones in their countries so they don't destroy ours.
@8YVHZD31yr
No. We are already good at screening legal immigrants.
@8S2LJ241yr
No, banning anyone based on who they are, what they believe in, and what they have done in the past is against the teachings of Jesus Christ
Deleted1yr
No, there should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. Bans should only arise if there is a potential threat from a individual.
@8Y2PZNR1yr
No, but take greater steps to screen them before they are able to enter further into the interior of the US
Deleted1yr
No, they shouldn't be banned immediately based on their religion. There should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. Bans should only arise if there is a potential threat from a individual.
@thomasjj01yr
We need to be helping the poor in our country before letting in so much people.
Deleted1yr
No, they shouldn't be banned immediately based on their religion, and there should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. Bans should only arise if there is a potential threat from a individual.
Deleted1yr
No, they shouldn't be banned immediately based on their religion, but there should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. Bans should only arise if there is a potential threat from a individual.
@8XQCYHB1yr
It's wrong to ban immigrants based on their religion, but immigrants from "high risk" countries should be banned.
@8XQ8B5G1yr
No, but we should keep them under high watch and criminal activities and relations to terrorist
Deleted1yr
No, but there should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just Muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. Bans should only arise if there is a potential threat from a individual.
@8WVSFDZ1yr
Yes but we need to keep improving the screening process.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
