Should Germany withdraw from the European Union?
The European Union is a politico-economic union of 28 countries with a combined population of over 510 million. The purpose of the EU was to promote free trade and immigration within its internal market. Each member country would also enact similar laws regarding agriculture and development. Germany has been a member of the EU since January 1958. Proponents leaving the EU argue that membership undermines Germany's sovereignty and leaving would help Germany control immigration. Opponents of leaving the EU argue would damage trade, cause unemployment and harm foreign investment.
19% Yes |
81% No |
16% Yes |
75% No |
2% Yes, but maintain free trade agreements with EU nations |
6% No, but renegotiate for strict limits on migration into the country and the terms of our monetary contributions |
0% No, but renegotiate the terms of our monetary contributions |
See how support for each position on “European Union” has changed over time for 183k Germany voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “European Union” has changed over time for 183k Germany voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Germany users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9J895W73mos3MO
no, but renegotiate migration limits and work to strengthen the eu and help bring georgia and albania into the eu in the near future
@9DYB5TH8mos8MO
No, and increase its involvement
@998FCRJ1yr1Y
No, we have seen what happens to a country that does it.
@9974N661yr1Y
Germany has been the one of the biggest beneficiary of European Union.
@97QQPCJ1yr1Y
No, but some border control is necessary
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “European Union” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH1 day1D
In the aftermath of Croatia's latest parliamentary elections, the country's political landscape is poised for a period of intense negotiations and coalition-building. The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), the long-standing ruling party, emerged as the victor in the recent polls. However, despite their victory, the HDZ finds itself in a precarious position, lacking the outright majority needed to govern unchallenged. This outcome sets the stage for a series of complex discussions aimed at forming a viable government.The election results underscore a fragmented political environment in Croatia, with the HDZ unable to secure a clear mandate. The party's leadership, under the guidance of the conservative Prime Minister, has expressed confidence in their ability to forge a new majority. Yet, the path to achieving this is fraught with difficulties, notably the necessity to engage with far-right groups that have gained significant traction. These groups, now potential kingmakers, could play a pivotal role in the formation of Croatia's next government, raising concerns about the direction of future policies.The HDZ's pursuit of a coalition is not merely a quest for power but a reflection of the broader challenges facing Croatia. As the country navigates economic recovery, social issues, and its position within the European Union, the composition of its government will have far-reaching implications. The negotiations will test the HDZ's political acumen and its willingness to make concessions to secure a stable administration.Observers are closely watching the unfolding political drama in Croatia, aware that the outcome could influence the nation's trajectory for years to come. The HDZ's ability to negotiate a successful coalition will determine not only its own fate but also the broader stability and direction of Croatia. As talks progress, the Croatian public and international community await a resolution that will shape the country's future.The situation in Croatia highlights the complexities of parliamentary democracies, where coalition governments often become necessary. The coming weeks will reveal whether the HDZ can navigate these challenges, forming a government that reflects the will of the electorate while addressing the pressing issues facing the nation. As Croatia stands at this political crossroads, the decisions made now will resonate well beyond the halls of parliament, affecting every aspect of Croatian life.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
Poland is currently witnessing a significant political event as voters across the nation participate in local elections, marking the first major electoral challenge for Prime Minister Donald Tusk's coalition government, which took office nearly four months ago. These elections are not just about selecting thousands of councillors and mayors; they are a litmus test for the government's popularity and its policies since assuming power. The outcomes are eagerly awaited, as they will provide a clear indication of the public's satisfaction with Tusk's leadership and his center-left coalition's direction.The local elections are particularly noteworthy as they come at a time when Poland's pro-European Union wing is seeking to turn the tide against what they describe as the 'age of populism' ushered in by the previous nationalist government. The ruling coalition, led by Tusk, is advocating for a more EU-aligned path, hoping that a strong showing in these elections will reinforce their mandate and enable them to steer Poland away from populist policies.The stakes are high, as the elected local officials will play a crucial role in the allocation of billions of euros in European Union funds, which are vital for Poland's development projects and infrastructure improvements. A favorable outcome for Tusk's government could bolster its position, providing it with the political capital needed to implement its agenda more effectively.Observers and political analysts are closely monitoring these elections, as they could signal broader political trends in Poland and potentially influence the country's future direction. A strong performance by the pro-EU coalition could also have implications beyond Poland's borders, sending a message to other EU member states grappling with similar populist challenges.As the votes are counted and the results begin to emerge, all eyes are on Poland. The local elections are more than just a test for Tusk's government; they are a reflection of the Polish people's aspirations and their vision for their country's place in Europe and the world.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a significant move to counter pro-Russian influence within the European Union, the Czech government has imposed sanctions on individuals and entities accused of engaging in influence operations. Among those sanctioned is Viktor Medvedchuk, a pro-Russian oligarch and former Ukrainian politician, known for his close ties to the Kremlin. This action underscores the growing concern among EU member states over Russia's attempts to sway political dynamics within the bloc.The sanctions, announced on March 27, also target the news website voiceofeurope.com, accused of disseminating pro-Russian propaganda. The Czech Prime Minister, Petr Fiala, emphasized that these measures are part of a broader effort to protect the EU's political landscape from external interference. The decision to sanction Medvedchuk and others is a clear signal of Czechia's commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty and that of its European partners.Medvedchuk, who has been a vocal supporter of Russia's policies towards Ukraine, finds himself increasingly isolated on the international stage. His inclusion in the Czech sanctions list highlights the extent of his involvement in activities deemed hostile to EU interests. The sanctions aim to curb his ability to influence political affairs in Czechia and beyond, marking a significant blow to pro-Russian advocacy within Europe.The move by Czechia has been welcomed by other EU member states, with many expressing support for the sanctions as a necessary step to counter Russia's pervasive influence campaigns. It reflects a growing consensus within the EU on the need for a unified and robust response to external threats to its democratic institutions and political integrity.As tensions between Russia and the EU continue to escalate, the sanctions imposed by Czechia serve as a reminder of the challenges facing the bloc in its efforts to maintain a cohesive and secure political environment. The actions taken against Medvedchuk and voiceofeurope.com are part of a broader strategy to defend European values and interests against those seeking to undermine them.
Explore other topics that are important to Germany voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
