Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Yes, but only when causing the animals as less as possible

thats animal cruelty

Yes, if there are many of the species

Yes but should be treated humanely. Having a good habitat for all animals.

Yes but only vaccines

No, it is inhumane if they are put into danger or put in pain because of them.

not for cosmetics and only if it is done humanely

Yes, but only for high risk testing

yes, but put lots of effort into creating better alternatives

Only limited if necessary

Certainly not for cosmetics and If there is no other viable way to test medicines such as through cellular cultures.

Only in humane conditions where the animal could be respected in the case they die or are affected in other ways

Maybe only rats

Depending on the type of animal I think animals that aren’t very good she be tested on

Humane way to test animals, find a way not to harm or vet animals suitable

Yes but have some sort of vet on standby.

Yes, but as long as it doesn’t severely harm the animal and until there’s a better alternative

No, but if they can not calculate in computer they can.

No, it is illogical to imply that animals are always representative for what humans are affected by

Depends on the animal; definitely no primates!

No, unless I’m very rare exceptions where it is a matter of worldwide health problems.

No, use paid volunteers.

In vitro cell culture, organ on a chip, tissue/human on a chip models can be an option.

No except if it is actually needed and makes sense because often the test on animals are useless anyway because the aren't humans

as long as we don't have better options we can't forbid it, but we need to have better options in the long run. that being said. definitely already ban it for cosmetics.

Yes, and they should be tested on humans too

They should be allowed to use animals to test drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but testing cosmetics on animals should be illegal.

Only for the most important drugs.

Yes, and allow humans to be tested on too

Yes, but not for cosmetics and they should decrease hurdles for human volunteers for life saving interventions

If you had to choose between a tested and an untested medicine in a critical situation, knowing the tested one involved animal testing, which would you choose and why?

Imagine if animal testing had never been allowed; in what ways do you think modern medicine might be different?

Can you think of a situation where you would consider animal testing justifiable, and what would that situation be?

What is your standpoint on the moral implications of sacrificing animal lives for potentially life-saving drugs for humans?

How might society change if animal testing for medical research was no longer permitted?

Have you or someone you know ever benefited from a medical treatment developed through animal testing?

If there was an equally effective alternative to animal testing, would you support a complete switch and why?

What are your thoughts on the balance between human health benefits and the welfare of animals in medical research?

Have you ever used a medical treatment and later found out it was tested on animals; what was your reaction?

How do you feel about using animals for testing the products you use daily?

yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.

Yes, but only less important animals.

Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.

Yes, unless the animals go through pain.

Yes as long as it’s not cruel and inhumane

Yes and allow human testing

Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.

Yes, but only things like rats and stuff

as long as they are not harmed