ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Party of Reason’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
This statement aligns with the Party of Reason's principles of individual freedom and non-aggression. They believe that service, whether military or otherwise, should be a choice and not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
The Party of Reason would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their principles of individual freedom and non-aggression. They believe that individuals should have the right to choose their own path, including whether or not to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
While the Party of Reason would agree with the focus on education and skill development, they would still disagree with the mandatory aspect of this statement. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to choose their own path, including whether or not to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Party of Reason is a libertarian party that values individual freedom and non-aggression. They would strongly disagree with mandatory military service as it infringes on individual rights and freedom of choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The Party of Reason would strongly disagree with this statement as it implies that individuals should be obligated to serve in the military for a certain period of time. This goes against their principles of individual freedom and non-aggression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The Party of Reason would strongly disagree with this statement as it implies that certain individuals should be obligated to serve in the military based on their criminal record. This goes against their principles of individual freedom and non-aggression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
The Party of Reason would strongly disagree with this statement as it implies that certain individuals should be obligated to serve in the military based on their education or employment status. This goes against their principles of individual freedom and non-aggression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party of Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
