Alternativ for Tysklands e parti

Enig

Ja

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has a complex stance on financial independence and government intervention. While they advocate for national sovereignty and have expressed skepticism towards centralized financial institutions like the European Central Bank, their platform does not explicitly address the issue of digital wallets. However, given their emphasis on national security and control over immigration, they might support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money independently, as long as there is some level of government monitoring to prevent illegal activities. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

While the AfD values national sovereignty and has shown skepticism towards overreach by centralized institutions, their strong emphasis on security and law enforcement could make them somewhat supportive of measures that ensure government agencies have the necessary tools to combat illegal activities, including financial crimes. However, this support might be tempered by concerns over individual freedoms and resistance to perceived government overreach, reflecting a nuanced position. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

The AfD's general advocacy for less EU control over national matters and skepticism towards centralized financial power suggests they would not strongly support a complete prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets. Their platform, focusing on sovereignty and individual freedoms within the context of national interest, implies a potential support for financial autonomy as long as it does not conflict with national security concerns. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

The AfD's strong stance on national security, law, and order, particularly in the context of combating terrorism and illegal immigration, suggests they would likely oppose the idea of allowing a privacy layer that prevents government monitoring of funds and transactions. The party has consistently advocated for policies that enhance the government's ability to monitor and control activities within its borders to ensure security and public order. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.