@9CRJ3Z310mos10MO
Lowering to 16; but they will be given a comprehensive test for understanding of politics, etc; to receive a voting license
No, leave it at 18 it's simple people under 18 years old are to young to make political decisions
@99ZCDMP1yr1Y
Yes, but a basic test demonstrating an understanding of politics and economy should be taken
There should be a maximum age to vote
Quite neutral, its fine the way it is.
@999PNHC1yr1Y
Yes and a basic political comprehension test
@999K5D21yr1Y
They should take a test and if they do not understand enough, be educated in it before voting
@996VPSH1yr1Y
Yes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote as well any citizen that pays taxes
@956FR6L2yrs2Y
By starting with the age of 14 there should be a randomised questionnaire where voting right can be aquired by answering topics about the political system and polling regulations. When attaining full age there can be no restrictions.
@946J8PG2yrs2Y
Yes, and Viters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of polutics in order to vote
@8VD74G43yrs3Y
Voters under the age of 16 should be required to take a test on their political knowledge so that only people who really care can vote under 18
@8V6XYSB3yrs3Y
No, voting should be banned
Yes, as long as civil liabilities are also lowered to 16
@8RWX2JQ3yrs3Y
The voting age should be replaced with a test demonstrating a person's understanding of the political system.
The voting age should be abolished and replaced with a basic test demonstrating someone's understanding of politics.
@8LSW2WV3yrs3Y
No, and voting should be banned
@8CM6DHC4yrs4Y
No, and remove democracy
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, it should be raised to age 21 to help ensure a more well-informed, tax paying voter
@94267X22yrs2Y
No and only men 25 and older who haver either served in armed forces police or owned a business should be allowed to vote
@spaceUnicorn0182yrs2Y
Yes, any citizen that is able to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics should be allowed to vote
@93RQL4H2yrs2Y
Yes, anyone who pays taxes and is educated in who to vote for should be aloud to vote.
@93LMRWT2yrs2Y
Yes, anyone who pays taxes (AKA has a job) should be required to vote.
@88LK76J2yrs2Y
No and abolish democracy
@8TMFV7P2yrs2Y
No, it should be raised, but have exceptions made for those in public service and for those who pay income taxes
@9334YP32yrs2Y
Only heterosexual cisgender male Christians with citizenship, who do not receive any type of welfare, benefits or aid from the government, should be allowed to vote, and their age, race and creed should not be taken into consideration at all.
@92XBMXF2yrs2Y
No. It should be raised to 21.
@92WS8Q42yrs2Y
No, but allow citizens who are 17 years old during a Primary Election to vote if they will turn 18 on or before the General Election
@LiamHal786386402yrs2Y
No people should have to serve in the army or national guard before they are allowed to vote
@michaelconnely2yrs2Y
If you are in the military, you should be able to vote at any age.
@heatherdvdprincess2yrs2Y
No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong.
@heatherdvdprincess2yrs2Y
No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated front making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong.
@8ZGPKM92yrs2Y
no because some people are gonna be immature about it and that is why it should stay the same
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, it should be raised to age 21 to help ensure a more informed voting public
@8Z6PZKW2yrs2Y
@8Z6D7QZ2yrs2Y
No, but minors should not have to pay taxes.
@49VGR682yrs2Y
Regardless, constitutional rights should be on a level playing field. If I have to be 21 to get a gun, the voting age should match or vice versa.
@8PWXW4S2yrs2Y
Yes, and also have a test seeing if they understand politics
@8YW4MHH2yrs2Y
No, but 16/17 year-olds shouldn't have to pay taxes if they can not vote.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, it should be raised to age 21
@8YBZGY72yrs2Y
No, but those under 16 should not pay income tax
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, the voting age should be the age of majority which is decided at the state level
@76WTH562yrs2Y
No. but the drinking and smoking age should be.
@88LK76J2yrs2Y
@8XDYP8P2yrs2Y
Yes, only if they are tax-paying, and every voter should have to pass a test on the understanding of basic politics.
@8XD66GW2yrs2Y
all over 18 years has the right to vote
@8X9Z87R2yrs2Y
Yes for local elections
@8X3KQBN2yrs2Y
No, the current age requirement of 18 is sufficient.
@8WP5BCC3yrs3Y
I think it's 18 so it's fine or if not 18 it should be 21.
@89CDM9C3yrs3Y
No, and the age should be raised. Additionally while the age of enlistment for voluntary service should remain the same, the age an individual can be involuntarily drafted should be raised as well.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...