Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9CRJ3Z3from Alabama answered…10mos10MO

Lowering to 16; but they will be given a comprehensive test for understanding of politics, etc; to receive a voting license

 @9BFWTV7Alliance for Germanyfrom Michigan answered…1yr1Y

No, leave it at 18 it's simple people under 18 years old are to young to make political decisions

 @99ZCDMPanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but a basic test demonstrating an understanding of politics and economy should be taken

 @999K5D2answered…1yr1Y

They should take a test and if they do not understand enough, be educated in it before voting

 @996VPSHanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote as well any citizen that pays taxes

 @956FR6Lanswered…2yrs2Y

By starting with the age of 14 there should be a randomised questionnaire where voting right can be aquired by answering topics about the political system and polling regulations. When attaining full age there can be no restrictions.

 @946J8PGanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and Viters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of polutics in order to vote

 @8VD74G4answered…3yrs3Y

Voters under the age of 16 should be required to take a test on their political knowledge so that only people who really care can vote under 18

 @8RWX2JQanswered…3yrs3Y

The voting age should be replaced with a test demonstrating a person's understanding of the political system.

 @8RQCQ27Leftanswered…3yrs3Y

The voting age should be abolished and replaced with a basic test demonstrating someone's understanding of politics.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

No, it should be raised to age 21 to help ensure a more well-informed, tax paying voter

 @94267X2 from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

No and only men 25 and older who haver either served in armed forces police or owned a business should be allowed to vote

 @spaceUnicorn018 from VI answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, any citizen that is able to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics should be allowed to vote

 @93RQL4H from Massachusetts answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, anyone who pays taxes and is educated in who to vote for should be aloud to vote.

 @93LMRWTanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, anyone who pays taxes (AKA has a job) should be required to vote.

 @8TMFV7P from Georgia answered…2yrs2Y

No, it should be raised, but have exceptions made for those in public service and for those who pay income taxes

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

Only heterosexual cisgender male Christians with citizenship, who do not receive any type of welfare, benefits or aid from the government, should be allowed to vote, and their age, race and creed should not be taken into consideration at all.

 @92WS8Q4 from Arkansas answered…2yrs2Y

No, but allow citizens who are 17 years old during a Primary Election to vote if they will turn 18 on or before the General Election

 @LiamHal78638640 from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

No people should have to serve in the army or national guard before they are allowed to vote

  @michaelconnely from Nebraska answered…2yrs2Y

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…2yrs2Y

No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong.

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…2yrs2Y

No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated front making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong.

 @8ZGPKM9 from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

no because some people are gonna be immature about it and that is why it should stay the same

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

No, it should be raised to age 21 to help ensure a more informed voting public

 @8Z6D7QZ from West Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

 @49VGR68answered…2yrs2Y

Regardless, constitutional rights should be on a level playing field. If I have to be 21 to get a gun, the voting age should match or vice versa.

 @8PWXW4S from Oregon answered…2yrs2Y

 @8YW4MHH from Connecticut answered…2yrs2Y

No, but 16/17 year-olds shouldn't have to pay taxes if they can not vote.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

No, the voting age should be the age of majority which is decided at the state level

 @76WTH56 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

 @8XDYP8P from Minnesota answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, only if they are tax-paying, and every voter should have to pass a test on the understanding of basic politics.

 @8X3KQBN from Nevada answered…2yrs2Y

 @8WP5BCC from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

 @89CDM9C from Kansas answered…3yrs3Y

No, and the age should be raised. Additionally while the age of enlistment for voluntary service should remain the same, the age an individual can be involuntarily drafted should be raised as well.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...