Should disposable products (such as plastic cups, plates, and cutlery) that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material be banned?

Not banned but highly taxed

yes if we have better options

Yes, but only products, that have a biodegradable alternative

yes, except for people who need them e.g. disabled people needing plastic straws cause the alternatives aren't good

I support the reduction of plastic etc but it is important for people with disabilities who need certain straws etc to still have access to them.

No, but littering should be punished and disposal needs to be done more thouroughly and concienciously by everybody.

No, global warming is not real

Generally yes, exceptions made for medical supplies and plastic materials as accessibility requirements

Yes, and move to phase out disposable products

Yes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material. As well increase consumer incentives to recycle products containing less than 50% of biodegradable material.

Yes, but it should be 25% instead of 50%

Reduce production of non-degradable products and increase tax for them

No, but they should contain more biodegradable materials.

It is not possible for all humans to use non recyclable products, so people with disabilities to better using bendable plastic straws for example. This should be taken into consideration, while still lowering the amount produced.

Yes except straws

No, but producers should be forced to take care about the waste properly.

As single use plastic in sanitary wrappings is helpful and life saving for some disabled people, we should provide options.

No, taxed out of existence

Yes, but keep plastic straws

This is a false leading question for those persons who understand that many or most products that are "Biodegradable" are breaking down in to daughter products that are just as bad for the environment if not worse. They, like cellulose microplastics are only less visible. The overall mass of disposable products needs to be drastically reduced (>50%) regardless of degradability. Needless disposability for convenience sake needs to be banned.

Yes but keep them available for disabled people who need them

No, it would not biodegrade if it is not 100% biodegradable

No, because a lot of disabled people need them and big companies do the modt damage to our planet.

No, increase both consumer incentives to recycle these products and tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products

No, increase both consumer incentives to recycle these products and tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products instead

No, but increase consumer incentives to recycle these products as well as increasing tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products

No but they should be taxed at a higher rate.

No, disposable use items are necessary for many disabled people to meet their needs

Further regulaions if disposable products are not at 50% biodegradable, and increase tax incentives for companies that makes products at 85% and up biodegradable.

we should try and phase non recyclable things out

Yes, and increase incentives that encourage consumers to reuse and recycle old products and use sustainable options.

No tax breaks. Establish progressive VATs on virgin material when biodegradeable materials are available.

no, but give more supplies to make more biodegradable materials

No because there are people who can't afford spending money on goods with biodegradable material however, people who CAN should be pushed to use more enviromentally friendly products.

Yes, but provide a better alternative than the paper stuff.

Not until more environmentally friendly products with more efficient means of production are commonplace.

No, and the government should not regulate what can be sold or bought

Yes, and we should also increase incentives that made it easier for consumers to reuse and recycle old products and use sustainable options.

Yes, but target personal and household spending and should be the result of better enforced regulations. Also, we should incentivize consumers to make it easier for them to reuse and recycle old products and use sustainable options.

No, but phase them out gradually

Yes, but target personal and household spending and should be the result of better enforced regulations. Also, we should incentivize consumers to make it easier for them to reuse and recycle old products and use sustainable options, so more people can recycle more often.

Yes, but target personal and household spending and make sure that these regulations are enforced properly. Otherwise, we should incentivize consumers to make it easier for them to reuse and recycle old products so that people can recycle more often, and increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products.

Yes, but target personal and household spending and make sure that these regulations are enforced properly and efficiently. Otherwise, we should incentivize consumers to make it easier for them to reuse and recycle old products so that people can recycle more often, and increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products.

depending on the circumstance it would depend on how many people use biodegradable material and what materials are used in it and how much will it cost .

No, but create more acceptable choices.

Yes, ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material.

Yes, but with gradual implementation

No, increase tax on disposable products and containers and incentivize consumers to return containers to producers for reuse

No, but require more regulations.