Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
No, thorough background checks are required to screen out potential terrorists
@9L7PBN24wks4W
Yes, and deport immigrants who promote anti-Semitism and terrorism
Yes, and deport them if they promote terrorism or anti-Semitism
Yes, and deport immigrants who promote terrorism, anti-Semitism, or racial hatred
Yes, and expel immigrants who incite violence and terrorism
Yes, and expel immigrants who incite terrorism, genocide, and anti-Semitism
@9HWQ7924mos4MO
immigrants from high risk countries should face more scrutiny
@9HBL6XXVolt Germany5mos5MO
They should be allowed to enter, if they can proove their identity with a passport or similar documents.
@9LRVG433 days3D
Yes, and deport immigrants who promote anti-Semitism, hatred of Israel, and terrorism
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...