Do you believe labor unions help or hurt the economy?

Hurt, labor unions must be banned

Hurt, and labour unions should be abolished

The current combative labor unionism and out-of-control laissez faire capitalism both hurt the economy. A more fruitful model like that of Germany, where labor unions have a seat at the corporate board, will be better.

Even though they may sometimes hurt the economy, they protect the weaker people (workers) in our society and therefpre should be strengthened.

Both, it depends upon the strength of labour unions.

Hurt, if their powers are not limited.

Helps the workers and hurts the economy.

Help the worker but hurt the economy

Help, but only for private unions

Hurts the economy but helps the workers.

Help, for private unions only

Usually helps the worker but bars the economy.

Hurt the economy but helps the worker

Not much impact on the overall economy one way or the other

Unions help some industries but can harm others

Help, However some such as the Police Union have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited

Depends on the situation, currently labor unions I beleive have gained too much power against employers, but in times of economic slowdowns/depressions, they should come to the defense of their members.

How do you think workers should balance demands for better conditions with the risk of losing their jobs in today's economic climate?

Have you or someone you know ever been in a situation where a labor union made a difference in their work-life balance?

In your opinion, should unions have more or less influence over political decision-making related to workers' rights?

How might a family’s financial stability be affected if the main breadwinner’s union goes on a long strike?

Do you believe that workers should have the right to strike even if it causes significant disruptions to the economy or services?

Can you think of any modern industries where unions are especially needed, or are there industries where unions might not be necessary at all?

How would you feel about joining a union if it meant you had to regularly participate in protests or strikes?

How do you think technology, remote work, or automation might change the importance of unions in the future?

Have you ever considered the ethical responsibility businesses have towards their workers when it comes to wages and working conditions?

Hurt they need to be abolished

Help, and their powers should be strengthened at a progressive rate.

Help, I support some private unions but I am against public unions

In your opinion, is it better to negotiate as an individual or as part of a larger group, like a union, when seeking better pay or fair treatment at work?

Permanently and irrevocably ban all leftist and anti-Zionist and/or anti-Semitic labor organizations in all its forms

Theoretically they're supposed to help us. But they are corrupt right now, in my opinion. Other than that, I am not well-versed in this subject to give a real opinion on unions.

I don't a stance on this issue.

Help, but you should have the right to work as well.

Both they protect the workers, but also sometimes hurt the workers.

Help but let the worker decide if they want to join and have oversight over how they interact with politicians.

Help, and abolish currency

Labor unions are helpful, but I don't think you should have to be part of a union to organize your workplace.

Their purpose is for the advancement of workers' rights, and for that I support them. Whether or not they help or hurt the economy is irrelevant

Hurt. Historically, unions had done some good but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited. I support some private unions but am strongly against public unions.

Get rid of all unions and let everyone be their own advocates

Hurt, Get rid of all unions and let everyone be their own advocates and have a level playing field for all people

Help, but I oppose public unions

This question is broad. Public unions tend to hurt. Private unions tend to help.

Get rid of all unions and let everyone be their own advocates and have a level playing field for all people. People speak louder then cooperations.

Hurt, Get rid of all unions and let everyone be their own advocates and have a level playing field for all people. People speak louder then cooperations.

help, but the ones that riot are not the ones to support

I believe they can help and hurt the economy.

It depends on what they're doing to combat their reason for the Union.

Regardless of whether or not they help the economy, they help people, and this is what is important.

Help, but should be replaced by Guilds

Help, but only when they're actually completely worker-controlled, otherwise they provide a cover for corporate interests.

I need more information to be able to form an opinion on this topic.

No public unions people that get paid by taxpayers should be able to get fired for underperfoming. Private unions like UAW IBEW ect are good but should not be compulsory to join.

Both. They can be good and bad for the economy depending on the union.

I don't understand what it means

It is within the right of all non-government employees to join a union. It doesn’t matter whether or not they help the economy.

A local Guild can be useful in privately establishing a min training wage, setting up apprenticeships and safety agreements. However massive national unions just basically do what nasty corporations do and keep merging and care little for the worker.

I don't have knowledge on this topic

Hurt, but I support most unions in increasing protections of labors

Hurt in some areas, and help in others, but private unions ultimately help

Not necessarily the economy overall, but they ensure benefits and fair wages for the working class.

Help, but limit how much they can donate to political campaigns

You have the right to unionize, but unions should really have less power.

Help, but if done to promote socialism instead of communism.

Help, but labor laws themselves hurt the economy.

most of them Help but Depends on what they do with it.

Help. Ban ability to make political donations and limit their powers.

They can help, however ban ability to make political donations and limit their powers.

I feel like labor unions can, both, help and hurt the economy.

They should have power limits

Hurt, but I do think that workers should have the right to unionize

I don't believe it affects the economy, but it does help ensure workers have proper pay, benefits, and rights.

100 years ago labor unions helped many workers, now the unions are robbing their members of wages, the administrators get rich, and almost nothing is done to benefit the workers but they support corrupt politicians.

Regardless, unions protect and increase the liberty of their members, who are the working class backbone of this nation.

I believe they do hurt and take a toll in the economy, but their ability to make political donations should be banned.

depends on the people in the union and who is running it, some are good some are not.

Help, but they should only serve their roles and ensure a healthy work environment.

My opinion doesn't matter, because the government should not pass laws favoring one side or the other

Help, but they exist to protect workers. Their impact on the economy is irrelevant.

In some ways both

They don't help nor hurt.

The job of labor unions is to give workplace representation to workers, not to help or hurt the economy. Of course, there will be consequences on that front as well, but it is not the point of their existence. Therefore, I think discussing unions in these terms is pointless.

Hurt, labor unions must be temporarily formed to settle grievances between workers and employers otherwise they are corrupt mafias and hurt everyone involved.

I believe the government should stay out of unions, private unions are helpful

Hurt but also help the worker.

Help the worker, hurts the economy

They help the worker but hurt the economy.

Hurts the economy but helps the worker

Hurt the economy but in more cases than not they protect the worker.