Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 2.5k Free Voters voters.
87% Yes |
13% No |
78% Yes |
11% No |
5% Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
2% No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
4% Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
0% No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.5k Free Voters voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.5k Free Voters voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Free Voters voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9LYCYNB7mos7MO
Yes. Video surveillance is a more equal and less bigoted alternative to much of modern law enforcement.
@9JQCDLG10mos10MO
Depending on the facts and circumstances, more surveillance is appropriate if obtained by court order could be appropriate
@99ZDXGL2yrs2Y
Yes, but require a court order to view a surveillance recording.
@96FYX2M2yrs2Y
@8V6XYSB3yrs3Y
Yes, and all private citizens should be monitored too
@8TZ4M6T3yrs3Y
I think it’s important to monitor areas that are dark at night, but for safety only
@8LSW2WV4yrs4Y
Yes, all accessible areas should be monitored
Join in on the most popular conversations.
