Crypto technology offers tools like payment, lending, borrowing, and saving to anyone with an internet connection. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would deter criminal use. Opponents argue that stricter crypto regulation would limit financial opportunities to citizens that are denied access to or can't afford the fees associated with traditional banking.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State
1 Digit Postal Code
Response rates from 235 SPD voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
51% Yes |
36% No |
6% Yes, the government should screen cryptocurrencies before circulation to ensure legitimate value and exchange rates |
4% No, and citizens should be allowed to protect their savings from reckless fiscal policies or subjugation |
0% Yes, and ban the use of crytocurrencies |
3% No, and underprivileged citizens deserve the same financial opportunities and services that traditional banks offer the wealthy |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 235 SPD voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 235 SPD voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from SPD voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NMDFZV6mos6MO
not possible the point of crypto is that its unregulated
@9N85ZJW6mos6MO
Just make sure cryptocurrencies aren't hurting people. They are too volatile to use by any state operated funds. Otherwise, it's the same as the stock market, so if people want to gamble with their money, it's their money.
@9MVL7Q56mos6MO
Yes, to prevent people falling for non-serious cryptocurrencies scams
Join in on the most popular conversations.
