@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 10mos agoActive 1mo ago

Should cities implement congestion pricing to reduce traffic in busy urban areas?

Congestion pricing is a system where drivers are charged a fee to enter certain high-traffic areas during peak times, aiming to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Proponents argue that it effectively reduces traffic and emissions while generating revenue for public transportation improvements. Opponents argue that it unfairly targets lower-income drivers and may simply shift congestion to other areas.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Classical Liberalism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 199 Classical Liberalism voters.

28%
Yes
72%
No
28%
Yes
72%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 199 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 199 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Classical Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2WXB9Vanswered…1mo1MO

Understand the need to reduce traffic. However, for such amount to exist, it is due to a lack of transports and/or the absolute need of the people to go there. May be too punishable to the latter.

 @B2928TVfrom Florida  answered…2mos2MO

Instead of congestion pricing, a practical public transportation system should be implemented.

 @9NYB5QXfrom California  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, as long as there is other ways to enter the city

 @9N85ZJWanswered…10mos10MO

No, cities should re-design to be people friendly, and less car friendly with better public transportation. The situation will resolve itself then.

 @9MMB6X9from Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but the revenues generated from this scheme should be allocated to bolstering the country's public transit system.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Porn stars launch campaign against Project 2025 targeting swing states

Concerned with provisions of Project 2025 that could criminalize pornography, a group of porn stars is jumping into the 2024 election, launching “Hands Off My Porn” and purchasing $100,000 in ads in swing states to spread their message. “We must fight back against this ultra-conservative agenda that is rooted in religious conservatism, fearmongering, and the suppression of women’s rights,” Casey Calvert, one of the porn stars involved with the effort, wrote alongside the announcement of the ads. Twenty porn stars came together to found Hands Off My Porn, and they are placing the ads on sites that show explicit content in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Michigan, warning users about Project 2025’s drive to criminalize porn.The ads will direct people to the Hands Off My Porn website, where they can watch testimonials about Project 2025’s dangers. “This ‘180-day playbook’ for the next Trump Administration puts the anti-porn agenda front and center – on page 5 of this nearly 1000-page document that’s endorsed by The Heritage Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), the Koch Brothers, and hundreds of conservative organizations,” the group writes online.Hands Off My Porn is referencing the foreword written by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, who calls for pornography to be “outlawed.” “It has no claim to First Amendment protection,” he writes. “Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned…telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

▲  176 replies