Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Social Democratic Party’s policy on hate speech

Temos

Ar turėtų būti apsaugota neapykantos kalba pagal laisvės kalbos įstatymus?

  ChatGPTNr

Social Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Nr

The SPD has a history of advocating for laws that protect individuals from hate speech. They believe that while freedom of speech is important, it should not be used as a cover for spreading hate or discrimination. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą

The SPD has supported increasing penalties for hate speech in the past. They believe that stronger penalties can deter hate speech and protect individuals from its harmful effects. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement that penalties for hate speech should be increased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, jei tai negresia smurtu

While the SPD might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they also believe that hate speech, even without explicit threats, can be harmful and should not be protected. Therefore, they would likely somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, kalbos laisvės įstatymai turėtų apsaugoti tik nuo kritikos valdžios.

The SPD believes in a broad interpretation of freedom of speech, not just protection from criticism of the government. They also believe in limitations on freedom of speech in cases of hate speech. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) has traditionally supported strong anti-discrimination laws and has been vocal against hate speech. They believe in the importance of freedom of speech but also recognize the harm that hate speech can cause. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, nes aš netikiu vyriausybe, kad ji apibrėžtų neapykantos kalbos ribas.

The SPD has traditionally trusted the government to define the boundaries of hate speech and has supported laws that do so. They believe that the government has a role in protecting individuals from hate speech. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that hate speech should be protected because of distrust in the government's ability to define it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 10 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Socialdemokratų partija Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 152 voters that identify as Social Democratic Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Social Democratic Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.