Do you support the use of nuclear energy?

Yes, Nuclear energy is the future

Yes, but only for investment into fusion and not fission; nonetheless, I prefer other options.

Yes, nuclear energy is much cleaner than coal. In general we need to ensure safety and public health over private profits, which was the problem in Fukushima and is currently a problem in coal mining.

Yes, but only in plants that reuse nuclear reactive waste or other reactive materials like thorium.

Yes, we should properly fund and nationalize Nuclear energy

Yes, especially the usage of fusion, so while using current nuclear energy, we should invest in renewable alternatives as well as nuclear fusion.

Yes to Fusion. No to Fission.

I don’t have enough knowledge about this subject to answer

No we should use coal, oil, and gas until we can make hydrogen fuel or a new alternative better. The clean energy sources pollute more than coal and gas.

Yes, but if it only militarily reason.

It's complicated only if there is a save way of using it wich isn't there yet so technically no.

I support fusion reactors

Yes, and have it all be privatized

Not nuclear fission, but it's important to keep researching on the topic of nuclear fusion

Yes, but with extreme precautions.

Yes, as well as investing in other clean energy alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal.

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens. However, renewable energy sources (i.e. wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower, etc.) should be prioritized first.

I don't support the use of nuclear energy but I support the research of nuclear energy

In what way? For weaponry? Not really

Yes, in principal, just as soon as we figure out safer ways of disposing of the nuclear waste that it produces. Until then, we should increase investment into fossil fuels.

Yes, but the govt. should invest and require safe and clean ways of disposal with minimal environmental damage.

depends on what the energy is being used to produce

yes but at a remote area

Yes, let the free market determine the best energy sources

Only if the plants do everything in their power to stablize it and keep enemies away from them(could be used for nuke)

Yes, with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures (i.e. proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely) to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens. However, renewable energy sources (i.e. wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower, etc.) should be prioritized first.

haudhauhduaidl.akdjoakjdijokdjkaildnbkaodnjak IDK

It is unhealthy for the environment and citizens and can cause long lasting negative affects.

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures and with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we increase investment into cleaner, renewable energy sources.

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures along with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we invest more into renewable energy sources.

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures along with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we invest more into cleaner, renewable energy resources.

yes because it could come to extreme and we could get damaged and destroyed by other nuclear weaponized areas

If someone like another state is using nukes for bad reasons and another state helps by using nukes to them? then yes.

I support the free market deciding what kind of energy is created and at what cost. If there is pollution involved, the government should tax it, in order that no one be exposed to it without just compensation.

Yes, if the right person uses it

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, and with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely, while we invest more into renewable energy resources.

i do but i also think that it could be bad for us just in case it ever were to not work

Yes, but more oversight and rigorous following of safety procedures is needed to avoid accidents and to ensure safety of citizens so long as it can be guaranteed as safe and the waste is safely disposed.

Yes, as long as it contained within a safe environment so that it doesn't harm people, or the environment.

yes but also hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal

it all depends on what

Honestly i do and i dont

Not a subject I pay attention to

Yes, but it should be away from people so they wont be effected by the nuclear reactions.

yes, I think it is OK but toward the future try to shift to a more environmentally sustainable option

i like it, but it should be used farther away from population

Yes, as long as it is safe for our environment

In circumstances where the plant isnt relying on things like water, solar, or wind energy

I'm nervous of the risks, but still open to the idea.