@9GK6DX6Volt Germany6mos6MO
The availability and reach of a nuclear power is better and higher. We are in no place to produce enough alternative clean energy to last us years without usage of fossil fuels.
@9GC774G7mos7MO
Geothermal and thorium reactors are need no counter, as they have less downsides that upsides, but hydroelectric needs to be carefully monitered, because it can heavly impact the river ecosystem.
@9FQF9SG7mos7MO
We need both, nuclear is quick to implement consistent and is the lowest carbon energy source. It provides strong base load capacity replacing the role of coal plants. Wind and solar provide excellent peak load management. But installed capacity and battery storage required to manage base load would be prohibitively expensive and ecologically disasterous
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...