Cross-border payment methods, such as cryptocurrencies, allow individuals to transfer money internationally, often bypassing traditional banking systems. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions countries for various political and security reasons, restricting financial transactions with these nations. Proponents argue that such a ban prevents financial support to regimes considered hostile or dangerous, ensuring compliance with international sanctions and national security policies. Opponents argue that it restricts humanitarian aid to families in need, infringes on personal freedoms, and that cryptocurrencies can provide a lifeline in crisis situations.
@B39KVZ91mo1MO
No, but it should limit the amount that could be sent
@B396QG71mo1MO
No but only banned for those who have been involved in crimes that are extreme.
@B34PBVKVolt Germany1mo1MO
The use of cross-border payment methods should be closely monitored and tightly regulated to prevent the money from going to hostile governments and organisations, but not banned
No, but do not issue visas to people from non-Nato nations.
If verified as \Humanitarian, yes. If terrorist, verified as terroroist, no.
No, but there should be a limit. Both (or more) parties must also be contactable.
@9P73NNT10mos10MO
if safe then yes and if high risk of intervention from extremist government or terrorists then no
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.