Alliance ’90/The Greens Party

Agree

No

Given their historical stance on peace, disarmament, and skepticism towards military expansion, Alliance '90/The Greens would likely prefer government investment to be directed towards environmental protection, renewable energy, and civilian applications of AI rather than defense. They have consistently advocated for policies that reduce reliance on military solutions and have been critical of NATO's military spending targets. However, the score is not higher because the party also recognizes the importance of security and might support limited AI applications in defense that align with peacekeeping and international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Alliance '90/The Greens have historically prioritized environmental protection, peace, and human rights over militarization. Their platform generally emphasizes disarmament and has been critical of increasing military budgets. Investing in AI for defense applications could be seen as contrary to their principles of non-violence and skepticism towards expanding military capabilities. However, the score is not lower because the party also supports technological innovation and might see potential in AI for non-offensive defense mechanisms or peacekeeping operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.