Animal Protection Party

Very strongly agree

No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead

The Animal Protection Party would strongly agree with increasing taxes on large multinational corporations instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, focus on ending tax evasion instead

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with focusing on ending tax evasion instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with increasing taxes on the wealthy instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree that cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy, as well as their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They may believe that maintaining or increasing public spending is necessary to address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Animal Protection Party would likely lean towards not making cuts to public spending, as they prioritize animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They may believe that maintaining or increasing public spending would better support these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, reduce military spending instead

The Animal Protection Party may agree with reducing military spending instead of cutting public spending, as this could free up resources for their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. However, this is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

The Animal Protection Party might slightly agree with reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials, but this is not a primary focus of their platform. They would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, reduce the number of government officials instead

The Animal Protection Party would likely be neutral on reducing the number of government officials, as this is not a primary focus of their platform. They would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and increase taxes

The Animal Protection Party might be somewhat opposed to this answer, as they would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations rather than cutting public spending. However, they might not be completely against the idea of increasing taxes in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Animal Protection Party would likely disagree with making cuts to public spending, as their focus is on animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. Reducing public spending could negatively impact these areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional

The Animal Protection Party would strongly disagree with eliminating federal agencies that are unconstitutional, as this is not relevant to their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They would likely prioritize maintaining or increasing funding for agencies that support their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.