Animal Protection Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Animal Protection Party would likely strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations, as this aligns with their ethical stance against violence and exploitation. This position would be consistent with their advocacy for non-violence and protection of the vulnerable, extending their concern for animals to concern for human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animal Protection Party, focusing on animal rights, environmental protection, and social justice, would likely agree with restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as this aligns with their broader ethical stance. However, their primary focus on animal rights over human political issues might make their agreement less strong compared to parties with a direct focus on human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Animal Protection Party would likely support measures that reduce violence and exploitation, their specific focus on animal rights and environmental issues means they might not have a strong position on banning all military aid to foreign countries. Their agreement would be based on the broader ethical implications rather than a focused policy stance on military aid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Animal Protection Party would likely disagree with the idea that no restrictions should be placed on arms sales, even to protect allies, as this could contribute to further human rights violations and conflict, which goes against their ethical principles of non-violence and protection of the vulnerable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given the Animal Protection Party's commitment to ethical principles and the protection of all beings, it is highly unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Such a stance would contradict their broader ethical and political philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.