Animal Protection Party

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Reducing misinformation is likely a priority for a party that relies on scientific evidence to advocate for animal rights and environmental protection. Misinformation can undermine efforts in these areas, making this approach appealing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animal Protection Party, focusing on animal rights and environmental protection, likely supports evidence-based practices in all fields, including medicine. Penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus aligns with promoting responsible and informed practices. However, their primary focus on animal rights over medical regulation might moderate their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This approach aligns with the party's likely belief in transparency and informed decision-making. However, their stronger emphasis on preventing misinformation and promoting scientific consensus might make this measure seem insufficient on its own. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party supports evidence-based practices, the idea of doctors losing their licenses might be seen as too harsh without considering the context of the advice given. Their focus is more on promoting positive change rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely agree that harmful advice should have consequences, their focus on preemptive measures to ensure all advice is scientifically sound might make them neutral on waiting for proof of harm before taking action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Animal Protection Party, valuing scientific consensus especially in areas impacting animal welfare and environmental health, would likely view the promotion of unproven or contradictory medical advice skeptically, especially if it risks public health or could indirectly affect their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given their emphasis on science and evidence to support animal rights and environmental issues, the party would likely disagree with allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without any repercussions, as it could undermine public trust in science and medicine. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.