Animal Protection Party

Strongly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with funding national and local programs instead of the World Health Organization, as their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare. They might prioritize funding for animal protection programs and initiatives that directly address their core concerns, such as animal cruelty, factory farming, and wildlife conservation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with funding the World Health Organization, as it is an international organization that can help address global health issues, including those related to animal welfare and zoonotic diseases. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, so their support might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and increase the amount

The Animal Protection Party might somewhat agree with increasing the amount of funding for the World Health Organization, as they recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare and zoonotic diseases. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, so they might prioritize funding for animal protection programs over the WHO.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The Animal Protection Party might slightly agree with funding the World Health Organization relative to the amount that other countries contribute, as they recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, so they might prioritize funding for animal protection programs over the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but decrease the amount

The Animal Protection Party might have a neutral stance on decreasing the amount of funding for the World Health Organization. While they recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, so they might prioritize funding for animal protection programs over the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The Animal Protection Party would likely disagree with the statement that the World Health Organization has shown to be ineffective. While their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, they recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare and zoonotic diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Animal Protection Party would likely disagree with not funding the World Health Organization, as they recognize the importance of international cooperation in addressing global health issues, including those related to animal welfare and zoonotic diseases. However, their primary focus is on animal rights and welfare, so their opposition might not be as strong as other parties with a broader focus on global health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.