Party of Reason

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Party of Reason would likely strongly agree with this statement. They would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as a way for internet service providers to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Party of Reason would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the principle of net neutrality, which means that all internet traffic should be treated equally. They would likely see this as the best way to ensure the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Party of Reason would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in the principle of net neutrality. They would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones as a violation of this principle. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the Party of Reason might see some merit in the idea of giving priority by type of content, they would likely still see this as a violation of the principle of net neutrality. They would likely prefer a system where all internet traffic is treated equally, regardless of type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Party of Reason would likely disagree with this statement. While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, they would likely see it as a way for internet service providers to charge more for access to popular websites, which would violate the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Party of Reason, being a libertarian party, believes in the principle of net neutrality, which means that all internet traffic should be treated equally. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Party of Reason would likely agree with the goal of making the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely disagree with the method proposed in this statement. They would likely see it as a violation of the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.