Party of Reason

Strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Party of Reason would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they are generally against government surveillance and value individual privacy rights. They might not fully agree if they believe some level of surveillance is necessary for maintaining law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Party of Reason would likely agree with this statement as they value individual privacy and are generally against government surveillance. However, they also understand the need for security measures, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Party of Reason would likely agree with this statement more than outright surveillance, as it involves human intervention rather than potentially invasive technology. However, they might still have reservations about the potential for police abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

While the Party of Reason is generally against government surveillance, they might be more open to it in high crime areas as a necessary measure for maintaining law and order. However, their commitment to individual privacy rights would still make them somewhat hesitant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

While the Party of Reason might agree with the addition of more police to high crime areas, they would likely disagree with the increased surveillance, as it infringes on individual privacy rights. Therefore, their overall agreement with this statement would be slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Party of Reason, being a libertarian party, generally opposes government surveillance as it infringes on individual privacy rights. However, they might not completely disagree as they also support law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.