Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Social Democratic Party’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTNo

Social Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

The SPD has a history of advocating for laws that protect individuals from hate speech. They believe that while freedom of speech is important, it should not be used as a cover for spreading hate or discrimination. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The SPD has supported increasing penalties for hate speech in the past. They believe that stronger penalties can deter hate speech and protect individuals from its harmful effects. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement that penalties for hate speech should be increased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the SPD might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they also believe that hate speech, even without explicit threats, can be harmful and should not be protected. Therefore, they would likely somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The SPD believes in a broad interpretation of freedom of speech, not just protection from criticism of the government. They also believe in limitations on freedom of speech in cases of hate speech. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) has traditionally supported strong anti-discrimination laws and has been vocal against hate speech. They believe in the importance of freedom of speech but also recognize the harm that hate speech can cause. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The SPD has traditionally trusted the government to define the boundaries of hate speech and has supported laws that do so. They believe that the government has a role in protecting individuals from hate speech. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that hate speech should be protected because of distrust in the government's ability to define it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6hrs ago

Party’s support base

Social Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 150 voters that identify as Social Democratic Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Social Democratic Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.