@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscienceStarted 9yrs agoActive 6 days ago

Do you support the use of nuclear energy?

Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Nuclear power in Germany accounted for 17.7% of national electricity supply in 2011, compared to 22.4% in 2010. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Grassroots Democracy

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.4k Grassroots Democracy voters.

31%
Yes
69%
No
15%
Yes
54%
No
15%
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
14%
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
1%
Yes, and nationalize the industry
0%
Yes, but with public subsidy
0%
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Grassroots Democracy voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Grassroots Democracy voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Grassroots Democracy voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @96DHBKLanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but invest in more modern, cleaner and safer solutions instead of using old technology

 @9LWLKXZanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, but the nuclear power plants should be closed and citizens who want nuclear power should be allowed to have a small reactor in their homes

 @8V6XYSBanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and have it all be privatized

 @8QGGW5Xanswered…4yrs4Y

Not nuclear fission, but it's important to keep researching on the topic of nuclear fusion

 @999255Tfrom Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in plants that reuse nuclear reactive waste or other reactive materials like thorium.

 @997GDHYfrom Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should properly fund and nationalize Nuclear energy

 @973P3ZDanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but if it only militarily reason.

 @9BFWTV7from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, Nuclear energy is the future

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.

 @JudiciaryPiper from Illinois submitted…8mos8MO

Russian nuclear power plant workers injured in Ukrainian attack

A Ukrainian attack on a substation used by the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant has injured eight employees of the facility, officials reported on Wednesday.Kiev allegedly launched three quadcopter-type kamikaze drones at the Raduga facility in Energodar, the city hosting Europe’s largest nuclear power station. The injured workers were part of a crew that was repairing the damage caused by a previous Ukrainian attack, the statement claimed. At least one worker is said to be in a serious condition.The initial strike on the Raduga substation happened two weeks ago and was confirmed by a monitoring mission of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Another site called Luch was hit in a separate strike.Neither station is critical for the work of the nuclear power plant, but its secondary facilities depend on them for power supplies. The strike on Wednesday once again disrupted the grid after both Raduga transformers were damaged.The IAEA has declined to attribute the attacks on substations in Energodar, but its chief, Rafael Grossi, has stressed that “whoever is behind this, it must stop.”“Drone usage against the plant and its vicinity is becoming increasingly more frequent. This is completely unacceptable and it runs counter to the safety pillars and concrete principles which have been accepted unanimously,” the official said.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W

Trump Pivots: "Pease Deal With Iran Now!"

Trump proposes a "Verified Nuclear Peace Agreement" with Iran, expressing preference for diplomacy over military action and calling for immediate negotiations.Despite advocating for diplomacy, Trump simultaneously issued an executive order reinstating his "maximum pressure" sanctions policy from his first administration.The sanctions campaign aims to completely halt Iran's oil exports, particularly focusing on exports to China, which currently receives about 1.7 million barrels per day.Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded by calling the maximum pressure strategy a "failed experience" while indicating openness to discussions about their nuclear program.The executive order includes reviewing and potentially rescinding existing sanctions waivers, including those related to the Chabahar port project operated by India.Iranian oil exports had previously dropped from 3 million barrels per day in 2018 to 420,000 barrels per day in December 2019 under Trump's first-term sanctions.Iran currently maintains a "shadow fleet" of oil tankers operating outside Western banking and insurance services to circumvent US restrictions.Oil markets showed limited reaction to Trump's announcement, with Brent crude dropping 1% as traders doubt the ability to completely block Iranian exports.Analysts suggest Iran could become a negotiating tool in US-China trade discussions, with China potentially willing to reduce Iranian oil imports as it modernizes its refining sector.Iranian analysts indicate Tehran would likely reject any agreement attempting to restrict their ballistic missile program, which they consider their primary deterrent.