@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomy11yrs ago

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.4k Bayern voters.

40%
Fewer
52%
More
29%
Fewer
33%
More
9%
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
8%
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
2%
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
5%
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
5%
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
0%
More, current benefits should be capped

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Bayern voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Bayern voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Bayern voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9FZH53Zfrom Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

More, extremely heavy restrictions and deny anyone who doesn't have undeniable reasons to need welfare. Welfare recipients would be heavily monitored to ensure they are not taking advantage.

 @8VL52JJanswered…3yrs3Y

A more targeted reform of the system and oversight of who and how benefits are resolved, favoring supporting Women and Children and families and isolated elderly persons. De-incentivizing single healthy male youth joblessness. Supporting all who have been classed out of careers they were trained for in their youth, by our ever changing and advancing society.

 @8LSW2WVanswered…4yrs4Y

more, and remove welfare entirely

 @8V6RSLManswered…3yrs3Y

Benefits per capita should be increased but holes in the existing system must be plugged simultaneously (e.g. claiming ration for dead persons, multiple ration cards etc.)

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Welfare” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

WHO Official Says Vaccine Passports Were A Scam

The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmissionDuring that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to "create an international trusted framework" for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out COVID passports. The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish government in late 2021 that COVID passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Claudia Sheinbaum Elected as Mexico’s First Female President

Claudia Sheinbaum, the former mayor of Mexico City, will become Mexico’s first female president after romping to victory in an election billed as a referendum on the leftist policies of departing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a vote that handed his party enough power in Congress to push through controversial constitutional changes.Sheinbaum, the candidate of the ruling Movement of National Regeneration, known as Morena, had 58.6% of the votes with 73% of the ballots counted, according to official results from Mexico’s election agency.Her closest rival, Xóchitl Gálvez, the candidate of a coalition of three opposition parties, had 28.4% of the vote and conceded defeat. Jorge Álvarez Máynez, from the center-left Citizen Movement, had 10.6%.Sheinbaum’s victory was bigger than expected and her margin of roughly 30 points would be the largest in a presidential vote since the 1982 election, when Mexico still was a single-party state. Pre-election polls had given her a 20-point lead.The vote reflected a resounding show of support for the government of López Obrador, a populist nationalist who won power in 2018 on an anticorruption platform. After taking office, he launched an austerity program for the federal government bureaucracy and redirected spending to welfare programs, especially cash handouts that included students and the elderly, keeping his approval ratings above 60%. López Obrador, who won with 53% of the vote in 2018, was barred by law from re-election.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.