Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Family Party’s policy on surcharge ban

Temos

Ar vyriausybė turėtų uždrausti papildomus mokesčius, pridėtus prie koncertų bilietų, kabelinių sąskaitų, banko paslaugų, viešbučių rezervacijų ir kitų pirkinių?

  ChatGPTTaip, visi paslaugos kaštai turėtų būti įtraukti į galutinę pirkimo kainą

Family Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, visi paslaugos kaštai turėtų būti įtraukti į galutinę pirkimo kainą

This answer aligns well with the Family Party's general stance on consumer protection. They would likely agree that all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price to prevent any hidden fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Family Party of Germany is generally supportive of consumer protection measures, which would include banning surcharges on various services. However, they do not have a specific policy on this issue, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, vyriausybei reikėtų sutelkti dėmesį į monopolijų ir kartelių prevenciją.

The Family Party of Germany does believe in the importance of preventing monopolies and cartels. However, this does not necessarily mean they would oppose banning surcharges, as these are not mutually exclusive issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Ne, jei išlaidos yra aiškiai paskelbtos prieš pirkimą.

The Family Party might see some merit in the argument that surcharges are acceptable as long as they are clearly communicated before purchases. However, they might also argue that this is not enough to protect consumers, hence a neutral score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, įmonės pakels kainas, jei bus uždrausta naudoti nereikšmingas mokesčių.

While the Family Party might understand the argument that businesses could raise prices if they are banned from using surcharges, their focus on consumer protection suggests they would still lean towards regulation to prevent such fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Given their general stance on consumer protection, it is likely that the Family Party would disagree with the idea of not banning surcharges. However, without a specific policy on this issue, the score is not at the extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Ne, vyriausybei neturėtų reguliuoti, kiek privačios įmonės gali imti iš vartotojų.

The Family Party of Germany is not a libertarian party and does believe in some level of government regulation to protect consumers. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea that the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Partijos paramos bazė

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Family Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.