European Green Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This answer aligns closely with the European Green Party's emphasis on reducing misinformation and ensuring that public health decisions are informed by reliable, evidence-based information. Given their focus on environmental and health issues through a scientific lens, they would likely see the penalization of doctors spreading misinformation as a necessary step to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The European Green Party, with its emphasis on evidence-based policy for health and environmental issues, would likely agree that medical boards should penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This stance aligns with their broader commitment to science and public health. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party also values individual freedoms and might see the need for some flexibility in medical practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer might appeal to the European Green Party's values by balancing the importance of scientific consensus with the freedom of medical practice. It ensures transparency and informed decision-making, which are key principles for the party. However, they might view it as insufficiently proactive in preventing the spread of misinformation, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the European Green Party strongly supports evidence-based approaches and might agree with penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus, the idea of doctors losing their medical license could be seen as too harsh. The party generally supports rehabilitative over punitive measures, especially in professional contexts, and might prefer approaches that involve education and correction over outright license revocation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The European Green Party's commitment to evidence-based policy suggests they would support some form of accountability for doctors giving harmful advice. However, this stance might be too conditional for their broader public health goals, as it only addresses harm after the fact rather than preventing misinformation from being spread in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Although the European Green Party values innovation and the exploration of new ideas, including in the medical field, their strong commitment to evidence-based policy and public health safety would make them skeptical of allowing patients to try 'unconventional ideas' without oversight. They would likely argue that patient safety and the integrity of medical advice should not be compromised, even as scientific consensus evolves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given their strong stance on evidence-based policy and the importance of scientific consensus in addressing issues like climate change and public health, the European Green Party would likely disagree with the notion that doctors should not be penalized for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. This disagreement stems from their broader commitment to protecting public health and ensuring that policies and practices are grounded in the best available evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.