尝试政治测验

Identity and Democracy Party’s policy on bonus cap

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average German [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Identity and Democracy Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This answer aligns with the Identity and Democracy Party's likely view on economic freedom and the belief that individuals and businesses should be able to negotiate terms of employment, including bonuses, without government interference. It reflects a core principle of rewarding success, which is often emphasized by right-wing and populist parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their right-wing populist stance, the Identity and Democracy Party is likely to support the idea of minimal restrictions on how businesses, including banks, reward their employees, seeing it as a matter of economic freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Identity and Democracy Party, being a political group in the European Parliament with nationalist and right-wing populist tendencies, generally supports free market policies and might view capping bankers' bonuses as an unnecessary interference in the business sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 50%上限

Similar to the reasoning for answer 3, lowering the cap to 50% is still a significant intervention in the market. While slightly less extreme, it is still likely to be opposed by the Identity and Democracy Party due to their general stance on economic freedom and opposition to what they might perceive as excessive regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% would be seen as a drastic intervention in the free market, which is contrary to the laissez-faire economic principles typically endorsed by right-wing populist parties like the Identity and Democracy Party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks would be in direct opposition to the free market and capitalist principles generally supported by the Identity and Democracy Party. Such a policy would be seen as extreme government intervention in the economy, which is contrary to the party's ideological stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here