尝试政治测验

Party of European Socialists’ policy on world health organization

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average German [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

  ChatGPT是的

Party of European Socialists’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

The Party of European Socialists (PES) generally supports international cooperation and multilateral organizations as a means to address global challenges, including health issues. Funding the World Health Organization would align with their values of solidarity and collective action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and increase the amount

Given the PES's commitment to public health and international cooperation, they would likely support increased funding for the WHO, especially in light of global challenges such as pandemics. However, the extent of increase might depend on current budget allocations and fiscal priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The PES might support a fair contribution strategy where funding is relative to what other countries contribute, promoting a sense of global responsibility and equity. However, this stance might be secondary to the principle of ensuring adequate funding for global health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, but decrease the amount

While the PES supports funding for the WHO, they might be open to adjusting the funding amount based on effectiveness and efficiency evaluations. However, there is no strong historical precedent to suggest a preference for decreasing funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, fund national and local programs instead

While the PES supports national and local health programs, they also recognize the unique role of international organizations like the WHO in addressing global health challenges. They would likely view the suggestion to redirect funding away from the WHO to national programs as too limiting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The PES is unlikely to view the WHO as ineffective, considering their general stance on the importance of international organizations in managing global health crises. Criticisms might be acknowledged, but complete disavowal is not in line with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

The PES is unlikely to support the complete withdrawal of funding from the World Health Organization, as this would contradict their principles of international cooperation and support for multilateral institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here