Animal Protection Party

Very strongly agree

不，应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Animal Protection Party would strongly agree with increasing taxes on large multinational corporations instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with focusing on ending tax evasion instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，增加对富人的税收来替代

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree with increasing taxes on the wealthy instead of cutting public spending, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and ensuring adequate funding for animal welfare and environmental protection initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Animal Protection Party would likely agree that cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy, as well as their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They may believe that maintaining or increasing public spending is necessary to address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

The Animal Protection Party would likely lean towards not making cuts to public spending, as they prioritize animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They may believe that maintaining or increasing public spending would better support these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，换成减少军事费用。

The Animal Protection Party may agree with reducing military spending instead of cutting public spending, as this could free up resources for their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. However, this is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是，但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

The Animal Protection Party might slightly agree with reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials, but this is not a primary focus of their platform. They would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不，减少政府官员的数量来替代

The Animal Protection Party would likely be neutral on reducing the number of government officials, as this is not a primary focus of their platform. They would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，还有增加税收

The Animal Protection Party might be somewhat opposed to this answer, as they would likely prioritize increasing taxes on the wealthy and large corporations rather than cutting public spending. However, they might not be completely against the idea of increasing taxes in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Animal Protection Party would likely disagree with making cuts to public spending, as their focus is on animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. Reducing public spending could negatively impact these areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Animal Protection Party would strongly disagree with eliminating federal agencies that are unconstitutional, as this is not relevant to their core issues of animal welfare, environmental protection, and social justice. They would likely prioritize maintaining or increasing funding for agencies that support their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.