尝试政治测验

Free Voters’ policy on drug policy

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

  ChatGPT不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

Free Voters’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

The Free Voters party has shown support for increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, suggesting that they would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

The Free Voters party has shown support for the decriminalization of drugs that offer medicinal benefits, such as marijuana. Therefore, they would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

The Free Voters party may agree with this statement to some extent, as they have shown support for the decriminalization of certain drugs, such as marijuana, but have not advocated for a blanket decriminalization of all drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

The Free Voters party has not explicitly advocated for the criminalization of all drugs, but they have also not supported a blanket decriminalization. Therefore, they would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

The Free Voters party has not made clear statements regarding increasing punishment for drug dealers. Therefore, it is unclear whether they would agree or disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

While the Free Voters party has not explicitly advocated for tougher drug laws, they have also not supported a blanket decriminalization of drugs. This suggests that they would likely somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Free Voters party does not have a clear stance on the decriminalization of all drugs. While they may support the decriminalization of certain drugs, such as marijuana, they have not advocated for a blanket decriminalization of all drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

The Free Voters party has not advocated for retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses. This suggests that they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Free Voters 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 207 voters that identify as Free Voters.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Free Voters’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.