尝试政治测验

Free Voters’ policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

  ChatGPTNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

Free Voters’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Free Voters party would likely agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance. They are focused on local issues and improving the quality of life for citizens, and they might see this as a more effective and less invasive way to address crime and security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Free Voters party is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as they are focused on local issues and improving the quality of life for citizens. They might see this as a reasonable compromise between security and privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Free Voters party might somewhat agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they are focused on local issues and improving the quality of life for citizens. However, their opinion might vary depending on the specific context and location, and they might prioritize other solutions over surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Free Voters party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, but their focus is more on local issues and direct democracy. They do not have a strong stance on this issue, and their opinion might vary depending on the specific context and location. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

The Free Voters party does not have a strong stance against increasing video surveillance in public places, but they might be concerned about the potential invasion of privacy. Their focus is more on local issues and direct democracy, so their opinion might vary depending on the specific context and location. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Free Voters party might be somewhat concerned about the invasion of privacy of citizens, but they do not have a strong stance on this issue. Their focus is more on local issues and direct democracy, so their opinion might vary depending on the specific context and location. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Free Voters 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 209 voters that identify as Free Voters.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Free Voters’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.