The German Party of Reason, known in German as Partei der Vernunft (PdV), is a political party that was founded in 2009. It positions itself as a libertarian party, advocating for minimal government intervention in both the economic and personal lives of its… Read more
ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Party of Reason’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
The Party of Reason would likely strongly agree with this answer. They would argue that if police are to use military grade equipment, they must be properly trained on how and when to use it. This aligns with their general stance on limited government and proportionate response. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
This answer aligns with the Party of Reason's general stance on limited government and proportionate response. They would likely support the use of military grade equipment by police in extreme situations, provided that its use is carefully regulated and deemed necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Party of Reason, being a libertarian party, generally supports a limited role for government, including police. However, they do not explicitly oppose the use of military grade equipment by police. Their stance would likely depend on the specific circumstances and whether the use of such equipment is deemed necessary and proportionate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
The Party of Reason might somewhat agree with this answer. They could argue that extreme situations should be handled by specialized agencies, but they do not explicitly oppose the use of military grade equipment by police. Their stance would likely depend on the specific circumstances and whether the use of such equipment by police is deemed necessary and proportionate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
While the Party of Reason advocates for limited government, they do not explicitly oppose the use of military grade equipment by police. They would likely argue that such equipment could be necessary in certain situations, but that its use should be carefully regulated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
The Party of Reason would strongly disagree with this answer. While they advocate for limited government, they do not support the abolition of the police. They believe in the rule of law and the need for a police force to maintain order and protect individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party of Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.