社会民主党

同意

是的

The Social Democratic Party (SPD) of Germany generally supports the idea of digital innovation and financial security, as long as it aligns with regulatory standards and consumer protection. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with their approach to balance innovation with oversight. However, their commitment to social justice and reducing inequality means they would likely advocate for strong regulatory frameworks to ensure these technologies do not exacerbate financial disparities or facilitate illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The SPD's approach to digital policy and financial regulation is more nuanced than outright banning technologies that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies. While they advocate for strong regulatory frameworks to ensure financial security and consumer protection, they also recognize the importance of innovation and privacy rights. Therefore, they might not fully support a ban but would likely advocate for balanced solutions that ensure both security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The SPD's platform typically emphasizes the importance of digital innovation and financial inclusion, suggesting they would not support outright bans on new financial technologies like self-hosted digital wallets. Their focus on regulation and oversight suggests they would prefer a model that includes some form of government monitoring rather than a complete prohibition, as long as consumer protection is prioritized. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the SPD supports digital innovation, their strong stance on regulatory compliance, financial oversight, and preventing money laundering or financing of terrorism means they would likely oppose the idea of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. The party's commitment to transparency and security in financial transactions would make them skeptical of technologies that could hinder law enforcement and regulatory agencies' ability to oversee financial activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.