Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Foreign Policy

Identity and Democracy Party’s policy on mandatory military service

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average German [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

  ChatGPTYes, and it should be at least two years of service

Identity and Democracy Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

The Identity and Democracy Party's nationalist perspective might support a more extensive commitment to national service, viewing it as a way to deepen patriotic values and national cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Identity and Democracy Party, with its nationalist and populist orientation, might see mandatory military service as a means to promote national unity and patriotism. However, their support might not be absolute due to the diverse views within the party and its emphasis on individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

While the party might lean towards mandatory service, they could agree that service should be a choice to some extent, respecting individual freedoms and acknowledging the importance of voluntary commitment over coercion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

The party might see the value in a program that balances military training with education and skill development, aligning with their interest in fostering a strong, capable, and well-prepared citizenry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

This position might resonate with the party's focus on practical solutions and addressing unemployment, but it could conflict with their broader nationalist views that favor universal service to promote unity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

While the party is tough on crime, targeting individuals starting to build a criminal record for mandatory service could be seen as punitive and not in line with fostering national unity or patriotism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the party's nationalist stance, complete opposition to mandatory military service is unlikely. They might see some value in it for instilling national values, but could be open to alternatives that also foster national identity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here