In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
@9J3KYCRFree Democratic3mos3MO
A decision on what ads are and are not allowed should not be regulated by the government, and instead should be left to the private companies themselves
@9CRJ3Z39mos9MO
No, aslong as they dont discriminate against other people.
@99DJNCR1yr1Y
No, they should Not be forced to do it
@8VL52JJ3yrs3Y
They must make open transparency of each political ad, who funded it and where from and for how much. and they must cluster political adds with an equal diversity in opinion. Furthermore they must allow media users to opt out of seeing any Paid For Political advertising on a whole if they so choose. Political adds must be based on Fact and truth and not on deceptive predatory information practices or Fraudulent claims. Social Media should be liable for fraudulent claims they allow to be made in their media. Therefore they should be liable and well motivated to fact check or decline less than verifiable political claims before showing them to the public.
@8V6XYSB3yrs3Y
No, but don't allow opposing parties to advertise
@8LSW2WV3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for the opposition
@8CM6DHC4yrs4Y
No, all social media companies should advertise the leader
@97S2D8G1yr1Y
No, but they should not be allowed to recommend one more than the others.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, but only allow political ads that are solely used for assistance in grassroots fundraising and organizing, not ads that challenge an opposing candidate's positions on issues
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, but only allow political ads that are used for assistance in grassroots fundraising and organizing
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, but only allow political ads that are used for assistance in grassroots fundraising and organizing, and do not vilify an opposing political party or candidate by stating unverified or misleading information
@4MYTQMW2yrs2Y
No, but disinformation is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but put warnings for false information.
@93MSBYT2yrs2Y
No, but they should be held liable for any lies perpetuated
@93F4Y242yrs2Y
No, Social Media companies should be free to choose what they allow on their sites.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, just put warnings for fake news.
@93DHP4B2yrs2Y
No, and they should no determine the truth value of the advertisment and must accept all political ads.
@93CS3TH2yrs2Y
Yes, they should, but there shouldn't be legal pressure to do so.
@Pastybums2yrs2Y
More tools are needed to block false information.
@92YHQCV2yrs2Y
No, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading
@8ZSR5NL2yrs2Y
No, but there should be regulations and a ban on accounts/posts that promote false claims. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, just provide false information warnings when necessary.
@93673YZ2yrs2Y
Yes, but only when political messaging is used to spread or promote hate against vulnerable groups
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but put warnings on fake news.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but put warnings for fake news.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No but implement false information warnings.
@932V85R2yrs2Y
Should be up to the individual companies.
@92XJ8SQ2yrs2Y
Private companies can do their own decisions
@92X5HLD2yrs2Y
No, but they should have the right to
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but require warnings for fake news.
@92SCWVZ2yrs2Y
No, but check for misinformation
@34477B52yrs2Y
No, but all paid advertisements should be fact checked before being allowed.
@92MKPWZ2yrs2Y
As long is not overly exessive that it disrupt the peoples viewing expericases and people can look at it or ignor it.
@92N5JGD2yrs2Y
Yes and no. There should be a large pool of candidates to choose from in a primary and a smaller pool for the election. Funds should be equal so advertising would be equal as well.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but fake news should have a warning.
@3HNRB332yrs2Y
No, bit I think any political advertising should come from individuals and should not be paid advertising. But I don't agree with complete bans as social media is the biggest way to get out information now since it is for many of the population their primary source of information.
@92GWJXX2yrs2Y
No, just place warnings on fake news.
@92DQP2K2yrs2Y
Companies should be allowed to regulate their own political advertising policies.
@92DRK652yrs2Y
They should allow it but it does not need to be as predominant as it is.
Deleted2yrs2Y
That is up to them. They are private companies.
@925J4Q82yrs2Y
if it is not important, it shouldn't be there
@8ZSR5NL2yrs2Y
No, but there should be regulations and a ban on accounts/posts that promote false claims/misinformation. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement.
@8ZYQ3WF2yrs2Y
No, because it is a main way people get information but, it should be limited.
@ThomasJ2492yrs2Y
There should be warnings for fake news.
@53Q6GBY2yrs2Y
No, but they should be subject to the same rules of advertisement and political campaigning
@8Z3NQVS2yrs2Y
No, But you should be able to block the ones you don't want to see.
@ThomasJj882yrs2Y
Facts should be prioritized but warnings should be shown for fake news.
@Thomasjj682yrs2Y
Facts only and a warning for fake news
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...