Masculism

Slightly agree

Yes, but scale back our current involvement

Masculism might slightly agree with scaling back involvement in the U.N. due to a general preference for focusing on domestic issues, including those affecting men, over international commitments. However, there are no specific historical references that directly link masculism to advocating for reduced international involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, does not inherently prioritize international relations or organizational participation, making its stance on the U.S. remaining in the United Nations neutral without specific historical references linking the ideology to this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

Masculism's focus on advocating for men's rights does not directly correlate with opinions on using U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect U.S. interests. The ideology's primary concerns are domestic and social rather than international military or peacekeeping strategies, making its stance neutral on this issue without specific historical references. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Masculism might slightly disagree with the idea of the U.S. leaving the United Nations, as such a stance could imply a retreat from global leadership and responsibility, including on issues that could affect men worldwide. However, the ideology does not specifically address such geopolitical stances, making the disagreement mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

Masculism might moderately disagree with removing the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. as this action could be seen as isolationist and detracting from global influence, including on issues that may impact men. However, this stance is more about general political ideology than masculism specifically, which does not directly address the location of international organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.