Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Alliance ’90/The Greens’ policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Alliance ’90/The Greens’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Greens would likely agree with this statement, as they would likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. They might argue that politicians who have committed less severe crimes and have demonstrated rehabilitation should be allowed to run for office, while those who have committed more severe crimes should be disqualified. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Greens would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support rehabilitation and social integration. They might argue that if a politician has served their sentence and demonstrated remorse and rehabilitation, they should be allowed to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Greens might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. They might be more lenient towards politicians who committed a crime unrelated to their political office, but would still likely have reservations depending on the severity of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Greens might somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support rehabilitation and social integration. However, they would likely have reservations depending on the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Greens might somewhat disagree with this statement, as they would likely consider the nature of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. They might not support a blanket ban on all politicians with a criminal record, as they generally support rehabilitation and social integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Greens would likely disagree with this statement, as it goes against the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' They would likely argue that disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime could be used as a political tool to suppress opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Alliance ’90/The Greens Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 165 voters that identify as Alliance ’90/The Greens.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance ’90/The Greens’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.