Alliance for Germany Party

Agree

No

Considering the Alliance for Germany's background in advocating for democratic reforms and market economy principles, they might support some level of government oversight in financial matters to ensure security and order. However, outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too restrictive, aligning only partially with their views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While the Alliance for Germany Party historically focused on democratic reforms and might generally support individual freedoms, the aspect of banning digital wallets without government backdoor access could align with a viewpoint of maintaining national security and preventing illegal activities. However, this stance would likely be moderated by concerns over personal freedoms and privacy, leading to a low positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Alliance for Germany Party, being a historical coalition from the late 1980s in East Germany that aimed for democratic reforms and eventual German reunification, might not have directly addressed modern digital finance issues. However, given its conservative and pro-market elements, there might be a cautious approach to fully endorsing self-hosted digital wallets without government control due to concerns over financial stability and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The Alliance for Germany, with its roots in a movement against an authoritarian regime and its push for freedom and democracy, might still prioritize security and the potential risks associated with completely unmonitored financial transactions. The idea of allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring could be seen as too radical and not in line with ensuring a stable and secure financial system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.