ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Family Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The Family Party of Germany would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they prioritize individual freedom and choice. They would likely support the idea of service being a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Family Party of Germany would likely agree with this statement, as they prioritize individual freedom and choice, and do not have a strong stance on military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The Family Party of Germany might agree with this statement to some extent, as they value education and skill development. However, they might not fully support the idea of mandatory service, even with a focus on education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
The Family Party of Germany would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that those who do not pursue further education or employment should be obligated to serve in the military. This could be seen as discriminatory or unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Family Party of Germany is focused on family values and social justice. They do not have a strong stance on military service, and would likely not support a mandatory service requirement for all 18 year olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The Family Party of Germany would likely disagree with this statement, as they do not have a strong stance on military service and would likely not support a mandatory two-year service requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
The Family Party of Germany would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies that those with a criminal record should be obligated to serve in the military. This could be seen as discriminatory and against their principles of social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Family Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
