Statistics are shown for this demographic
Municipality
Zipcode
Response rates from 294 76 voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
39% Yes |
34% No |
27% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 294 76 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 294 76 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from 76 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4RJBQY2mos2MO
not for cosmetics, and only when absolutely necessary with no viable alternatives. There should be very strict regulation in order to be as ethical as possible while testing (torturing) animals. There is no pretty solution. There is only harm reduction.
@B3FYCTY4mos4MO
think that they should be as long is it isn't an animal that is protected and also that it isn't a deadly drug. The human body is also different than animals so that plays a role in it as well
@B3C5Y8Q4mos4MO
To some extent yes, but not to animals like dogs and cats that can form a deep relationship with humans.
@9NS8DFR1yr1Y
No, instead criminals who are sentenced to death or life without parole should be given an option to contribute to society by joining these research programs. They should also be given full information in regards to possible side effects. They should also get rewarded for their contribution.
@9MH6NBR1yr1Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and they should decrease hurdles for human volunteers for life saving interventions
@9LZP5VQ1yr1Y
I think that they should be as long is it isn't an animal that is protected and also that it isn't a deadly drug. The human body is also different than animals so that plays a role in it as well.
@9F7X9L62yrs2Y
@9CTFD6S2yrs2Y
Yes, but only when causing the animals as less as possible
