Statistics are shown for this demographic
Zipcode
Response rates from 570 Animal Protection Party voters.
24% Yes |
76% No |
14% Yes |
76% No |
9% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 570 Animal Protection Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 570 Animal Protection Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Animal Protection Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NS8DFR6mos6MO
No, instead criminals who are sentenced to death or life without parole should be given an option to contribute to society by joining these research programs. They should also be given full information in regards to possible side effects. They should also get rewarded for their contribution.
@9MH6NBR7mos7MO
Yes, but not for cosmetics and they should decrease hurdles for human volunteers for life saving interventions
@9LZP5VQ7mos7MO
I think that they should be as long is it isn't an animal that is protected and also that it isn't a deadly drug. The human body is also different than animals so that plays a role in it as well.
@9CTFD6S1yr1Y
Yes, but only when causing the animals as less as possible
@9D2872J1yr1Y
Yes, if there are many of the species
@9C2TJK82yrs2Y
Yes but should be treated humanely. Having a good habitat for all animals.
@9BHV7T42yrs2Y
Join in on the most popular conversations.