Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
64% Yes |
36% No |
64% Yes |
36% No |
See how support for each position on “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 157 Germany voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 157 Germany voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Germany users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9LJSLM62wks2W
No, thorough background checks are required to screen out potential terrorists
@9L7PBN24wks4W
Yes, and deport immigrants who promote anti-Semitism and terrorism
@9JNKGSD3mos3MO
Yes, and deport them if they promote terrorism or anti-Semitism
@9K6GL4V2mos2MO
Yes, and deport immigrants who promote terrorism, anti-Semitism, or racial hatred
@9JJD9LD3mos3MO
Yes, and expel immigrants who incite violence and terrorism
@9JDVPMX3mos3MO
Yes, and expel immigrants who incite terrorism, genocide, and anti-Semitism
Explore other topics that are important to Germany voters.