@ISIDEWITHQuestionsSocial IssuesStarted 13yrs agoActive 4 days ago

What is your stance on abortion?

Abortion is a medical procedure resulting in the termination of a human pregnancy and death of a fetus. In Germany abortion is legal in in the first 3 months of pregnancy and women must undergo mandatory counseling before receiving the procedure. The average abortion is 6.1 per 1000 women rate among women aged 15-44

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Classical Liberalism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 278 Classical Liberalism voters.

83%
Pro-choice
17%
Pro-life
58%
Pro-choice
10%
Pro-life
13%
Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months
7%
Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child
8%
Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions
0%
Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest
5%
Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 278 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 278 Classical Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Classical Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B37MMRXanswered…1wk1W

Pro-Life, but allow abortion only when there is a risk to the Mother's life, excluding the risk of suicide.

 @B33RR78answered…2wks2W

Pro-Life, but I can understand why someone would decide on abortion. So instead of ban government should focus on sex education and social programs.

 @B2M8X5Gfrom South Carolina  answered…1mo1MO

Birth should be controlled by the state. Where families cannot economically provide for the wellbeing of the child or the child carries a genetic condition which will make it a useless eater, abortion should be mandatory.

 @B2932Z8answered…2mos2MO

Pro-life, based on the precautionary principle, but I support abortion in cases of rape, incest, danger to the mother's life, or anencephalic fetuses."

 @9ZHHWF2from Virginia  answered…4mos4MO

Pro-Choice, and provide free early natal genetic screenings to ensure that profoundly disabled children will not be cursed with a short, painful, meaningless life

 @9GC2R3Sanswered…1yr1Y

Pro-life under circumstance where the social cost of abortion is above the social benefit, pro-choice when the reverse - Declining fertility; less children and lower future workforce; however increase in female labor force participation.

 @9DLJ5FCfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

Pro-life,but it should be allowed in such cases of severe birth defects and severe mental retardation.

 @8TKC2SFanswered…4yrs4Y

Pro-choice, but for purely practical reasons. What should matter is the expected happiness of the baby.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Abortion” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Kamala’s Warning: ‘Unhinged’ Trump Seeks Dictatorial Power in 2024

Kamala Harris has attacked Donald Trump for seeking “unchecked power” if he wins the White House again, placing what she described as his threat to American democracy at the heart of her closing argument to voters less than two weeks before the presidential election.In a rare statement from the vice-president’s residence in Washington on Wednesday, Harris attacked Trump for being “increasingly unhinged and unstable” and said there would be no “guardrails” to restrain him during a second term in office.Harris’s comments were a reaction to comments in The New York Times from John Kelly, Trump’s former chief of staff, who said the ex-president was an “authoritarian” who admired Adolf Hitler and fell into the “general definition of fascist”.“The bottom line is this: We know what Donald Trump wants. He wants unchecked power. The question in 13 days will be, what do the American people want?” Harris said in her brief remarks.The Democratic candidate was speaking before heading to Pennsylvania for a televised town hall on CNN, while Trump was campaigning in GeorgiaThe Trump campaign rubbished Harris’s comments as “desperate” and “easily disproven”.Polls put the two candidates in one of the tightest White House races in recent memory, leaving both vying for a closing message that wins crucial undecided voters.While President Joe Biden frequently referred to Trump as a threat to democracy before ending his re-election bid in July, Harris’s pitch had focused instead on defending personal freedoms, such as abortion, and economic benefits for the middle class, often dismissing Trump as unserious and bizarre.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Republican Heartland Embraces Abortion Rights Amid National Fight

Voters in seven states approved ballot amendments establishing a right to abortion in their state constitutions, continuing a broad repudiation of the abortion bans enacted since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.Missouri, which was the first state to officially enact an abortion ban after Roe was overturned in 2022, became the first state where voters ended a ban at the ballot box, with 52 percent approving the measure. A similar amendment passed by 57 percent in Montana, another Republican-controlled state. In two battleground states, Nevada and Arizona, measures to enshrine a right to abortion passed, with more than 60 percent of the vote for each.But the abortion rights movement also hit its limits, stalling in what had been a winning streak on ballot measures post-Roe, as voters in three Republican-controlled states, Florida, South Dakota and Nebraska, rejected amendments that would have established a constitutional right to abortion.Even as they hailed their victories, abortion rights supporters warned that the second Trump administration could use federal power to essentially invalidate the new state-level protections.President-elect Donald J. Trump boasted on the campaign trail of having overturned Roe — he appointed the three justices who helped swing the court majority. And anti-abortion activists have laid plans for a second Trump administration to use existing federal statutes to ban abortion pills, and to use the 14th Amendment to establish fetal personhood, which would effectively criminalize abortion at any stage of pregnancy. A Republican-controlled Congress could look to pass a federal abortion ban.Opponents of abortion rights looked at the results and saw victory. “Supported by the abortion industry and its allies, Harris and Walz campaigned with fanatical fervor on abortion — and the voters rejected them,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life.And Democrats who hoped that support for ballot measures would also lift their candidates to victory were largely disappointed.The groups backing the winning measures, however, said the victories even in states that went solidly for Mr. Trump were a clear signal that most Americans, regardless of party, age or gender, do not want the government restricting abortion.Republican Heartland Embraces Abortion Rights Amid National Fight

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…10mos10MO

Should the government incentivize the construction of affordable housing?

No

▲  518 replies3 disagree