Reformism

Strongly agree

是的，但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后

Reformists would likely support this answer, as it represents a gradual change that allows foreigners to vote after demonstrating a commitment to the country by living there for a significant period. This approach balances the need for inclusivity with concerns about maintaining the integrity of the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但是只有在此国家生活10年后

Similar to answer 5, this approach represents a gradual change that allows foreigners to vote after demonstrating a long-term commitment to the country. However, the 10-year requirement might be seen as too restrictive by some reformists, who could prefer a shorter waiting period. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利

This answer aligns with the reformist idea of gradual change and improvement. Allowing foreigners who contribute to the country through taxes to vote can be seen as a fair and moderate approach to expanding voting rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，但是他们应该只被允许在当地选举中投票

This answer might be seen as a reasonable compromise by reformists, allowing foreigners to participate in local politics while still maintaining some restrictions on their voting rights. However, it might not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的，但是他们不该被允许为当地选举投票

Reformists might see this as a reasonable compromise, allowing foreigners to participate in the political process while still maintaining some restrictions. However, it might not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该，应当只有合法公民才可投票

While reformists might not support completely open voting rights for all foreigners, they also seek to improve existing systems and might see this answer as too restrictive. They would likely prefer more moderate measures that expand voting rights to some non-citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Reformism seeks to improve existing systems, so completely denying voting rights to foreigners may not align with their goals. However, they might support some restrictions on voting rights for non-citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Reformism generally supports gradual change and improvement within existing systems. Allowing all foreigners to vote without any restrictions might be seen as too radical a change for reformists, who would likely prefer more moderate measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，但是只有在他们是欧盟公民的情况下

Reformism is not inherently tied to any specific regional alliances or preferences, so this answer would likely be seen as arbitrary and not in line with their general principles of gradual change and improvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.