Party of Reason

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Party of Reason would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in individual freedom and equality. They would likely argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and goes against the principles of freedom and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Party of Reason would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely argue that banning a specific group based on religion is a form of discrimination and goes against the principles of freedom and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The Party of Reason might somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests a more targeted approach to immigration control rather than a blanket ban. However, they would likely argue that any such policy should be based on individual assessment rather than nationality or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While the Party of Reason might agree with the need for improved security measures, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This is because such a policy could be seen as discriminatory and infringing on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Party of Reason (Partei der Vernunft) is a libertarian party in Germany that advocates for individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants, as it infringes on individual rights and freedoms. However, they might agree with the need for improved security measures, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The Party of Reason would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their belief in individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely argue that such a policy is overly restrictive and infringes on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.