この有権者の回答と比較したあなたの回答は次のとおりです。
移民 › 犯罪を犯した移民の強制送還
H>H 個人的な答えはい、それぞれの国に帰ることが移民にとって安全である限り |
内政 › 武器を持つ教師たち
H>H 個人的な答えYes, if they are trained and have a reliable way to ensure the gun does not end up in the wrong hands yet is easy enough to access. |
ソーシャル › 妊娠中絶
H>H 個人的な答えPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
ソーシャル › LGBTの養子縁組を行う権利
H>H 個人的な答えNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
ソーシャル › 死刑
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
経済問題 › 同一賃金
H>H 個人的な答えNo, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, tenure, and negotiation skills that determine a fair salary, and the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees, except for minimum wage |
経済問題 › 税金
H>H 個人的な答えReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
医療 › 単一支払者医療保険制度
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
経済問題 › 最低賃金
H>H 個人的な答えYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
外交政策 › 国連
H>H 個人的な答えはい。そして、私達の利益を守るため、国連の平和維持活動軍を使うべき。 |
外交政策 › 他国の選挙
H>H 個人的な答えはい、しかし、専制的な支配者による人権侵害から国を守るために |
ソーシャル › 性別の職場の多様性
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ。経営陣は、ジェンダーを問わず、もっともふさわしい条件を備えた人々であるべき |
科学 › 予防接種の強制
H>H 個人的な答えNo, but use third party funding to raise awareness that vaccines aren't bad. |
ソーシャル › 性転換
H>H 個人的な答えNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions. And ban all gender transitioning treatments. |
移民 › 市民権テスト
H>H 個人的な答えはい、ただしとても基本的でシンプルなトピックのみがカバーされるべき |
経済問題 › ユニバーサルベーシックインカム
H>H 個人的な答えNo, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
科学 › 原子力エネルギー
H>H 個人的な答えYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
ソーシャル › トランスジェンダーアスリート
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、アスリートは出生証明書に記載されている生物学的性別に基づいて競争するべきです |
外交政策 › NATO (北大西洋条約機構)
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、他の国まで、彼らの財政的貢献を増加させません |
犯罪 › 私立刑務所
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
環境 › プラスチック製品の禁止
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、そうではなく、生分解可能な製品を製造する企業に対する税制上の優遇措置を増やすべきです |
ソーシャル › ヘイトスピーチ
H>H 個人的な答えYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate. |
選挙 › 選挙権年齢の下限
H>H 個人的な答えNo. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
ソーシャル › ニカブ
H>H 個人的な答えYes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
内政 › インターネットの中立性
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ |
外交政策 › 軍事支出
H>H 個人的な答えIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
選挙 › 外国人の選挙権
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、法で定められた国民だけが投票権を持つべきです。 |
内政 › ドラッグポリシー
H>H 個人的な答えNo, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
内政 › ソーシャル メディアの規制
H>H 個人的な答えNo, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
環境 › 動物実験
H>H 個人的な答えはい、でも化粧品ではありません |
ソーシャル › 戦闘中の女性たち
H>H 個人的な答えYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies. |
国家安全保障 › 外国暗殺
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but only if the evidence is virtually conclusive. |
外交政策 › アフガニスタン
H>H 個人的な答えYes, the war has been going on for so long that it sounds stupid now. We're not getting anywhere. |
経済問題 › 政府支出
H>H 個人的な答えYes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
移民 › 二重国籍
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but only with allied countries. |
経済問題 › 生活保護
H>H 個人的な答えMore. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
経済問題 › 生活保護受給者の薬物テスト
H>H 個人的な答えYes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
外交政策 › 外国支援
H>H 個人的な答えDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
選挙 › 選挙資金
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、しかし労働組合と非営利団体からの寄付金が許可されるべき |
選挙 › 候補者の透明性
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ、彼らがそうすれば私はより彼らを尊敬するとは思いますが、必須にすべきではありません |
内政 › 国旗焼却
H>H 個人的な答えYes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
経済問題 › 法人税
H>H 個人的な答えFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
経済問題 › 労働組合
H>H 個人的な答えHelp, except with teacher tenure. |
外交政策 › ウクライナとNATO
H>H 個人的な答えYes, if they're willing to follow all its rules |
医療 › 在宅注文
H>H 個人的な答えNo, but people who know they have coronavirus should be required to stay at home, be given extra assistance if needed, and be charged for negligent manslaughter or something similar if they disobey and it results in someone's death. |
医療 › 安全な避難所
H>H 個人的な答えNo, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
犯罪 › 犯罪者の投票権
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
選挙 › 犯罪歴のある政治家
H>H 個人的な答えはい、罪が重罪、暴力犯罪、金融犯罪、または性犯罪でなければ |
医療 › COVIDマスクマンデート
H>H 個人的な答えいいえ |
内政 › 任期の制限
H>H 個人的な答えWhatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
内政 › ソーシャルメディアでの政治広告
H>H 個人的な答えNo, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
犯罪 › 警察の資金調達
H>H 個人的な答えPolice should still exist for violent crimes and crimes where people are likely to be willing to be violent, such as robbery. We should take all the steps we reasonably can to prevent people from becoming criminals, as well as preventing crime. We could prevent people from becoming criminals by strengthening the family, such as by making some forms of “discipline” illegal that have been proven by many, many quality studies to have negative long-term effects. We can also include a mandatory “Family” class in public compulsory education to teach the essentials of parenting for the best outcomes in children and for happy and successful marriages, which are the basis and foundation of good parenting. The education and welfare systems can also be improved. We can prevent crime from people who chose to be criminals anyways in many ways. One way is to make sure all law-abiding (background checked), trained, safe citizens can have a gun and ammo. Other jobs should be created to take care of non-violent crimes previously addressed by cops. Cops should also get anti-discrimination training. Research shows that this is possible. Cops should be trained in this until they show that enough or all bias has been trained out before interacting with people in those minorities. Complaints against cops should also be taken very seriously, and investigated as a high priority, and local stations should not be afraid to fire officers for gross negligence. Those who commit negligence but not gross negligence should be retrained in the thing they violated and be put on probation. It would also be helpful for cops to build relationships with the community, or at least know who everyone is, so that they are virtually 0% likely to shoot someone they think is violent, who actually called 911 for help. In fact, police should be trained on how to safely apprehend violent criminals without killing them if possible, to further prevent unnecessary killing. |
外交政策 › 香港逃亡者引き渡し
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
経済問題 › 景気刺激
H>H 個人的な答えContinue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt. |
犯罪 › 刑務所の過密
H>H 個人的な答えNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
経済問題 › オフショア金融
H>H 個人的な答えYes, but companies should not. |
ハウジング › ホームレスの野営地
H>H 個人的な答えはい |
教育 › 学校休学
H>H 個人的な答えYes, unschooling (a form of homeschooling without a curriculum) is legal, so why is it not legal for kids to choose not to go to school when they are enrolled? |
経済問題 › 国家所有権
H>H 個人的な答えThat is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
経済問題 › 4日間の平日
H>H 個人的な答えLet's see what happens in the other countries and then experiment with it if it is worth it. It is worth it if it increases GDP and/or significantly improves mental health and family ties. |
経済問題 › 分散型ファイナンス
H>H 個人的な答えはい |
人気のある政治テーマについて、この有権者と比較する方法は次のとおりです。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた10質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた6質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた5質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた8質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた10質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた2質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた6質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた12質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた20質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた2質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた4質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要な1質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要な1質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要な1質問に基づいています。
これが、伝統的なイデオロギーの軸でこの有権者と比較する方法です。
© 2024 iSideWith.com.無断転載を禁じます。このサイトを使用すると、当社のユーザー契約とプライバシー ポリシーに同意したものとみなされます。 iSideWith.com は、小売業者とのアフィリエイト パートナーシップの一環として、当社のサイトを通じて購入された製品から売上の一部を得る場合があります。 iSideWith.com の事前の書面による許可がない限り、このサイトの素材を複製、配布、送信、キャッシュ、またはその他の方法で使用することはできません。