Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 单一支付者医保
JC>JC Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
医保 › 精神健康
JC>JC Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
JC>JC Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
JC>JC Personal answer应该,直到恐怖袭击减少 |
社会 › Gender Transition
JC>JC Personal answerYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
移民 › 公民考试
JC>JC Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
JC>JC Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
社会 › Hate Speech
JC>JC Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
JC>JC Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
JC>JC Personal answer是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
JC>JC Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
JC>JC Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
环境 › Animal Testing
JC>JC Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
移民 › 技术移民
JC>JC Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
JC>JC Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
JC>JC Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
JC>JC Personal answeryes, but make them come back if any further trouble happens against the US |
移民 › 双重国籍
JC>JC Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
JC>JC Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
经济 › 公司税
JC>JC Personal answerRaise, and end all tax loopholes |
医保 › 安全港
JC>JC Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
JC>JC Personal answerYes, and increase the current amount of resources we are providing |
国内政策 › 任期限制
JC>JC Personal answer不,官员可以获得宝贵的经验而且随着时间的加长他们会成为更有效的代表 |
医保 › World Health Organization
JC>JC Personal answerYes, and increase the amount |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
JC>JC Personal answeryes, but only if there is still enough funding to police departments that they can still sustain themselves. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
JC>JC Personal answerGoogle, no. amazon and facebook? yes, because they're getting too big, and facebook/meta is extremely shady. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
JC>JC Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
教育 › School Truancy
JC>JC Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
JC>JC Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
JC>JC Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
JC>JC Personal answerNo, but the government should create an official digital currency |
教育 › Charter Schools
JC>JC Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
JC>JC Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
JC>JC Personal answerNo, and I don’t understand the concept of decentralized finance |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 20 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.