Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
总统大选 › Popular Vote
8>8 Personal answerYes, on regional but not national issues |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
经济 › National Pension Fund
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answerDie Zuwanderung sollte fair unter den Mitgliedsländern verteilt werden |
国内政策 › 视频监控
8>8 Personal answerNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
总统大选 › Presidential Election
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › National Railway
8>8 Personal answerYes, but allow more local control |
经济 › VAT Rates
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, to provide economic growth |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
外交政策 › Backstop
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
8>8 Personal answerYes, but with more transparency |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
经济 › 经济刺激
8>8 Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
国内政策 › Civil Service
8>8 Personal answer增加 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer不 |
教育 › School Truancy
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 25 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.